Preview Newsletter
Puliafito EOD (8/2)
-
After a Scandal Hits, USC Fundraisers Move to Keep $6 Billion Campaign Thriving
Aug 2, 2017 | The Chronicle of Philanthropy
By Eden Stiffman
In the two weeks since the Los Angeles Times reported that the University of Southern California's well-known former medical dean had been leading a double life — succeeding as a scholar but abusing hard drugs, hiring prostitutes, and witnessing a young woman's drug overdose just three weeks before his resignation — the institution’s fundraisers have been hard at work to call donors who might have been jolted by the news.
Traditional Media Coverage
-
After a Scandal Hits, USC Fundraisers Move to Keep $6 Billion Campaign Thriving
Aug 2, 2017 | The Chronicle of Philanthropy
By Eden Stiffman
DAVID MCNEW/GETTY IMAGES
NEWS AND ANALYSIS
AUGUST 02, 2017
i PREMIUM
After a Scandal Hits, USC Fundraisers Move to
Keep $6 Billion Campaign Thriving
By Eden Stiffman
In the two weeks since the Los Angeles Times
reported that the University of Southern
California's well-known former medical dean
had been leading a double life — succeeding as a
scholar but abusing hard drugs, hiring
prostitutes, and witnessing a young woman's
drug overdose just three weeks before his
resignation — the institution’s fundraisers have
been hard at work to call donors who might have
been jolted by the news.
The drugs-and sex stories might seem like a bad enough public-relations problem for fundraisers
at an institution that only a few months ago had announced it was planning to meet its $6 billion
fundraising goal 18 months earlier than planned, shattering the idea that only institutions like
Harvard and Stanford could succeed with such audacious goals.
But the national media attention caused another problem for the development o!ce: Journalists
also painted a picture of Carmen Puliafito, a renowned eye surgeon, as a billion-dollar guy — a
star fundraiser for the institution. It’s easy to see how they got that idea: News releases on USC’s
website show Dr. Puliafito posing with celebrities at fundraising events.
The Times reported that Mr. Puliafito "was a key fundraiser for USC, bringing in more than $1
billion in donations, by his estimation."
So as the university’s fundraisers sought to check in with big donors — lest the university lose
any gifts or commitments — it also faced questions about whether it could keep pulling in big
dollars without the medical dean.
Turns out that was an awkward query for
Albert Checcio, USC’s senior vice president for “We're taking advantage of an
USC Fundraisers Move Quickly to Reassure Donors After a Scand... https://www.philanthropy.com/article/USC-Fundraisers-Move-Qui...
1 of 5 8/2/17, 9:01 AM
advancement.
"We never described him as a star fundraiser;
it was self-described," says Mr. Checcio, who
has been raising money for colleges for 40
years.
Dr. Puliafito "wasn’t a star fundraiser, he was just OK," he says, noting that other academic
leaders did a better job of pulling in money for the institution. "We have stars."
When asked why, if that was the case, USC's website featured Dr. Puliafito posing with celebrities
at fundraising events, Mr. Checcio said that was not necessarily a sign of fundraising talent. For
those gala dinners, the money is raised ahead of the event when people make gifts in exchange
for tickets and tables, Mr. Checcio said. "The dean's job is to welcome everybody and talk about
the importance of supporting whatever that unit is and pose for pictures," he said. "That is it;
that's the whole story."
An Evolving Strategy
USC has faced many questions about its responses to complaints about Dr. Puliafito, who resigned
as dean a year ago when confronted with accusations about his behavior, though he remained on
the medical sta". University o!cials have initiated the process to fire Dr. Puliafito, who could not
be reached for comment by The Chronicle.
The university’s position went from an initial "no comment" to gradually being more and more
open to ultimately acknowledging that the university had "received various complaints" about the
former dean’s behavior leading up to his resignation.
While the university was developing its publicity strategy, Mr. Checcio and his sta" worked
quickly behind the scenes. The first step was to gather top fundraisers to talk about the known
facts, he says. The next step was to get those fundraisers to call all major donors. "We’re taking
advantage of an awkward situation to get closer to some of our top donors," Mr. Checcio said.
He met with the development sta" on the university's health-sciences campus the Thursday
following publication of the article about Dr. Puliafito and met with fundraisers on the main
campus the following Wednesday, listening to their concerns and mapping out a strategy for
handling incoming calls from donors.
So far there haven’t been many, he says, estimating about a half-dozen calls on both campuses.
Their concerns have been not with the university's handling of the scandal but of concern for Dr.
Puliafito’s behavior, Mr. Checcio said. Fundraisers have been speaking with big donors about
positive things happening on campus while pointing them toward o!cial university statements
awkward situation to get closer
to some of our top donors.”
USC Fundraisers Move Quickly to Reassure Donors After a Scand... https://www.philanthropy.com/article/USC-Fundraisers-Move-Qui...
2 of 5 8/2/17, 9:01 AM
on the scandal.
Jonathan Bernstein, a Los Angeles crisis-management consultant, called the university’s initial
response to questions from reporters at the Los Angeles Times and elsewhere "a wrong-way case
history."
Still, Mr. Bernstein applauded the advancement department’s current strategy.
"You know that donors have read about it, but you’re only going to hear from people who are the
most happy and most unhappy," he said. That’s why it makes sense to reach out to top donors
first, before they call, and assure them that the money they gave will go for the intended purpose.
"The rule of thumb is that in such situations you should come out communicating with
compassion, confidence, and competence," he said.
Fundraisers' role is to stay in touch with their donors and speak with them about their
relationship to the university, Mr. Checcio said, adding that donors have been appreciative of
their approach.
"You don't want your fundraisers editorializing on the story," he said. "In a story as complex as
this, often you can't speak about details yourself."
Other Scandals
Other university fundraising departments have found ways to recover from scandals involving
faculty and sta".
Pennsylvania State University managed to exceed its $2 billion campaign goal in the wake of
revelations that former assistant football coach Jerry Sandusky had sexually abused children and
that the university’s legendary football coach Joe Paterno had failed to properly report the abuse.
One reason the university was able to stem any loss of donations was the fact that Rodney
Erickson, then the interim president and a former provost, delayed his retirement to help
maintain continuity, Penn State fundraisers told The Chronicle at the time. Fundraisers also
analyzed the outpouring of feedback from donors, alumni, and others to better track which
donors were most supportive of the institution during the crisis.
The University of Missouri saw fundraising dip following daily protests over race relations last
fall. When fundraisers became concerned that the institution wasn’t telling its story to donors
fast enough, the development o!ce decided to share what it knew.
"We realized we couldn't always wait for the perfect talking point," said Tom Hiles, Mizzou's vice
chancellor for advancement.
Fundraisers also developed a rapid-response strategy, answering nearly all of the 3,400 calls,
USC Fundraisers Move Quickly to Reassure Donors After a Scand... https://www.philanthropy.com/article/USC-Fundraisers-Move-Qui...
3 of 5 8/2/17, 9:01 AM
emails, and social-media posts from students, alumni, and donors. And they brought in Penn
State's now retired senior vice president for development, Rod Kirsch, to share what his sta" had
learned through their own scandal and try to boost fundraisers’ morale. By a few months later,
loyal big donors and the university’s continued attention to the institution’s capital campaign
helped.
Mr. Bernstein said situations at Penn State and USC make it clear why it’s important to avoid
depicting any one nonprofit o!cial as the key to an organization’s success.
"Anytime you tie your fundraising or your PR to the reputation of individuals, you take a risk,"
Mr. Bernstein said.
Because it is inevitable that problems will crop up that damage the image of an organization, he
added, it’s important to train and prepare for a crisis long before one erupts. "Reputation is your
most important asset for any e"ort, including fundraising," he said, "And sometimes fundraising
organizations have a desire to put short-term profit ahead of long-term revenue," ignoring
warning signs that immediate gains might lead to trouble down the road.
Campaign to Continue
At USC, Mr. Checcio says the Puliafito scandal has caused no change in the institution’s plans to
extend its capital campaign, even though it has already raised $6.3 billion, exceeding its goal.
"I’m not sure how much longer we’ll run it out, but I know we have no intention of stopping,"
Mr. Checcio said.
Nearly $1.5 billion of that total will go to supporting the areas Dr. Puliafito oversaw: a teaching
hospital, medical school, and medical research.
Rohit Varma, who was appointed to succeed Dr. Puliafito as dean, took over fundraising duties
more than a year ago, Mr. Checcio noted.
Mr. Checcio said he believes that honesty and transparency with donors will go a long way. The
next step, he said, will be forward-looking. "The institution is so much bigger than any one
person, and our goals and aspirations don’t change because of a very awful isolated incident
involving one person, tragic as it is."
Long-Term Effects
Nonetheless, volatility of any kind has the
potential to slow giving, says John Glier, CEO
of fundraising consultancy Grenzebach Glier
and Associates, who has worked with USC over
the past decade and advised other universities
“You don't want your
fundraisers editorializing on
the story. In a story as complex
as this, often you can't speak
USC Fundraisers Move Quickly to Reassure Donors After a Scand... https://www.philanthropy.com/article/USC-Fundraisers-Move-Qui...
4 of 5 8/2/17, 9:01 AM
including Penn State through turbulent times.
In the long run, he says, universities that have
su"ered scandals rarely endure long-term fundraising damage. "Those who've been committed
to the institution understand its values," he says. "I doubt that any donor would walk away and
say, ‘I no longer want to give.’ "
Sara Stern, executive vice president for philanthropic marketing at Lipman Hearne, suggests
fundraisers use this moment to ask what's on donors' minds and what questions they have. "This
is a serious issue, a big breach of trust," she said, adding that it does provide an opportunity to
rearticulate the institution's core values.
Sta" members should also use this moment to continue to communicate what they are doing to
keep students and faculty safe, to ensure that faculty that have drug-abuse issues have access to
the help they need and are not in a position of power that could hurt others.
"USC is an astonishing fundraising machine," she says. "if they handle this well and openly with
frequent communication meetings going forward, then they'll be OK."
Send an e-mail to Eden Sti!man.
about details yourself.”
Traditional Media Coverage
Add recipients
Suggested