Preview Newsletter

Ethicon Media Monitoring 6/18/2018

    Client Attorney Privileged/Attorney Work Product/At Request of Counsel

    Online Sources

  1. Boston Scientific Wins 3rd Pelvic Mesh Verdict In Mass.

    Jun 15, 2018 | Law 360

    By Alison Noon

    For the third time, a Massachusetts jury has decided that Boston Scientific was not at fault for the side effects of its pelvic mesh products and properly warned one of the thousands of women who have sued manufacturers of the transvaginal slings.
  2. A weak pelvic floor can mean more than a little leakage

    Jun 18, 2018 | The Sydney Morning Herald

    By Mary Ward

    We generally associate having a poor pelvic floor with incontinence.
  3. Silent affliction affecting one in four

    Jun 15, 2018 | Herald Sun

    ... the Therapeutic Goods Administration banned some trans-vaginal mesh products for prolapse, and single incision mini slings for stress urinary incontinence.

    Client Attorney Privileged/Attorney Work Product/At Request of Counsel

    Online Sources

  1. Boston Scientific Wins 3rd Pelvic Mesh Verdict In Mass.

    Jun 15, 2018 | Law 360

    By Alison Noon

    For the third time, a Massachusetts jury has decided that Boston Scientific was not at fault for the side effects of its pelvic mesh products and properly warned one of the thousands of women who have sued manufacturers of the transvaginal slings.

    The 15-person Middlesex County jury decided, like two prior juries in separate cases, that Boston Scientific was not negligent in its design nor manufacture of the Pinnacle Pelvic Floor Repair Kit or the Obtryx Sling System-Halo and did not fail to warn consumer Ana Martinez or her doctor about about the products.

    Martinez, who lives in Nevada, sued the medical device manufacturer in 2012, saying the company designed a defective product that can cause severe pain and never told her or her obstetrician-gynecologist, Kord Strebel, about the long-term side effects of the devices used to treat pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence.

    The mesh can fix incontinence, but can also lead to punctured organs, infections, bleeding, pain during sexual intercourse and urinary problems, the company has said in court documents and product warnings.

    The Cambridge, Massachusetts-area jury was impaneled on May 24. Trial lasted about three weeks, including at least two days of jury deliberation. The jurors returned the verdict the afternoon of June 14.

    Thousands of women have sued Boston Scientific over its pelvic mesh products. Counsel to the plaintiffs selected Martinez's case as a bellwether.

    Plaintiffs have fared better in other states. A Florida state jury hit Boston Scientific with a nearly $27 million verdict in 2014 that was upheld by the Eleventh Circuit in 2017. A New Jersey state jury on made Johnson & Johnson unit Ethicon pay $15 million in damages over claims the company lied about the safety of a pelvic mesh product that caused a woman debilitating pain. Ethicon was also previously stuck with a nearly $3.3 million jury verdict in West Virginia in a related bellwether case.

    More than 25,600 cases involving mesh products manufactured by Boston Scientific, Johnson & Johnson and C.R. Bard Inc. consolidated in West Virginia federal court over the last several years. After major settlements and a handful of trials, more than 10,000 cases remained in the MDL docket as of Friday, according to data provided by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation.

    A spokesman and counsel to Boston Scientific declined to comment Friday and counsel to the plaintiffs did not return messages seeking comment.

    Boston Scientific is represented by Susan Donnelly Murphy and Lisa Oliver White of Murphy & Riley PC, James H. Keale of Tanenbaum Keale LLP and Andrea Steele of Shook Hardy & Bacon.

    The plaintiffs are represented by James J. Waldenberger, Kila Baldwin, Thomas Bosworth and Kristen Sipala of Kline & Specter PC.

    The case is Martinez et al. v. Boston Scientific, case number 1281CV03081, in Middlesex County Superior Court.

    https://www.law360.com/articles/1054447/boston-scientific-wins-3rd-pelvic-mesh-verdict-in-mass-

    Return to headline | Return to top

  2. A weak pelvic floor can mean more than a little leakage

    Jun 18, 2018 | The Sydney Morning Herald

    By Mary Ward

    We generally associate having a poor pelvic floor with incontinence.

    But for former Australian netball captain Sharelle McMahon, the signs that something was wrong with her pelvic floor were different.

    "Pain around my pelvis, and a bit of instability through there was the main way it showed up for me," the mother of two recalls.

    McMahon, 40, first experienced problems with her pelvic floor after the birth of her son, Xavier, in 2012. Returning to the court for the 2013 season, she underwent 12 months of physiotherapy to alleviate the pain she was experiencing.

    "I had to restrict the training I was doing because I was in so much pain. I had to restrict some of my movement."

    Melbourne physiotherapist Annabelle Citroen says a poor pelvic floor can initially reveal itself in a variety of circumstances.

    "Anything from someone feeling like they need to get to the toilet with a little bit more urgency, whether there's some leakage along the way or just a fear that they won't make it if they don't rush, to the odd little bit of leakage, and again it may only be a drop or two, with a cough or sneezing, laughing, [or] playing sport," she says, adding that high impact sports, like netball, give people the most grief.

    Then there are issues not with the pelvic floor being too weak, but simply not functioning as it should.

    "Women may experience painful intercourse, or difficulty putting a tampon in, or they may have pain generally in the pelvic region," explains Citroen.

    "And that can actually be an indication that the pelvic floor muscles might be working a bit too hard or holding onto some increased tension, so they might need to be trained to let it go."

    If left untreated, a weak pelvic floor can lead to pelvic organ prolapse, where the pelvic organs – such as the bladder, bowel or uterus – fall through the vagina.

    While most women know that they should be doing pelvic floor exercises (also known as "Kegels", after US gynaecologist Arnold Kegel), much of Citroen's work is in correcting poor technique.

    Despite being in tune with her body as an elite athlete, McMahon recalls learning in a physio session earlier in her career that, while she thought she had been doing pelvic floor exercises, she was not doing them properly.

    "I am someone who lived a life where this sort of stuff has been spoken about to me for along time, but I've had challenges."

    Pelvic floor issues can present themselves at any age, from childhood right up to the elderly, although they are more common in pregnant women, women who have given birth, and seniors.

    "From a statistical point of view, about 80 per cent of women will be affected by incontinence, either bladder or bowel, and over half of them are younger than 50," Citroen says.

    While incontinence is normal, Citroen says it should not be something women are complacent about, or they will risk more serious problems later in life.

    "If women start to see those 'once offs' – like a leak when they laugh, or needing to rush off to go to the toilet – as a bit of a sign there being some poor pelvic health issues, it may be that they don't need to go down the path of more invasive measures."

    Those more invasive measures have been in the headlines recently, after the Senate released its report into pelvic mesh implants, which can be used during pelvic floor surgery for severe incontinence or prolapse to reinforce the tissue.

    The report, released in July, recommended the mesh implants "only be used as a last resort".

    The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) banned the sale of mesh for use in patients with pelvic organ prolapse in November, and a class action involving more than 700 women who say they have suffered debilitating pain after undergoing pelvic floor surgery for prolapse using the mesh implants is currently before the courts.

    However, Dr Jenny King, chair of the Urogynaecological Society of Australasia (UGSA), is concerned women suffering from severe incontinence are now shying away from surgery, even when it could be "life-changing", stressing that mesh implants are not "intrinsically evil".

    The implant used in surgery for incontinence is known as the "mid-urethral sling". In use for 20 years, it is recommended by the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, among other international medical organisations, as having an 80 to 90 per cent rate of complete cure or significant improvement when used in women suffering from incontinence.

    Despite the evidence, UGSA figures show a 32 per cent decline in stress incontinence surgery in women aged 25-54 since peak rates in 2009.

    Dr King, who is based at Sydney's Westmead Hospital, explains that mesh implants are sometimes necessary in pelvic floor surgery, particularly in older women, or in women who have already had the surgery.

    "The problem with ladies with pelvic floor weakness, be it incontinence or prolapse, is they probably have poor connective tissue," she says.

    "We are holding up tissues against gravity; these are tissues that were never strong, and they are past their use-by date."

    Anecdotally, Dr King says she has patients who are "frightened" by what they have heard about vaginal mesh and, as a result, they are receiving sub-standard operations.

    "People are coming back [with failed surgery] because I've been too anxious to push them into mesh," she says, adding that surgery should only ever be recommended for women who genuinely require it, in circumstances where the muscles are beyond repair through physiotherapy.

    The moral of the story? Do your Kegels.How to work on your pelvic floor

    It is estimated that only one in three women can activate their pelvic floor correctly.

    Citroen says one of the most common mistakes is using the wrong muscle.

    "Quite often we'll see a lot of effort in the glute, your external buttocks muscle, a lot of effort in the inner thigh muscle, or being driven from the abdominals," she says.

    While "a little bit" of external movement is okay, if those muscles seem to be moving too much, you are probably using them instead of your pelvic floor.

    You should also avoid sucking in your belly, or holding your breath (although you may be concentrating, Citroen says you can't do too much with the muscle before you're out of breath).

    "Sometimes we'll also see a 'bearing down' motion, where you are pushing down on the muscle, which can actually further weaken it," she advises.

    As for how to do it properly, Citroen's best tip is to imagine you are doing something else with the area.

    "We will refer to things such as 'trying to stop the flow of urine'; that's not something that we recommend you do regularly, but the thought of it can help," she says. "Also, trying to hold in wind. And, for women who have worn a tampon before, the thought of holding in that area."

    https://www.smh.com.au/lifestyle/health-and-wellness/a-weak-pelvic-floor-can-mean-more-than-a-little-leakage-20180605-p4zjje.html

    Return to headline | Return to top

  3. Silent affliction affecting one in four

    Jun 15, 2018 | Herald Sun

    ... the Therapeutic Goods Administration banned some trans-vaginal mesh products for prolapse, and single incision mini slings for stress urinary incontinence.

    Access to full text unavailable – subscription required.

    Story can be found here:  https://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/victoria/silent-affliction-affecting-one-in-four/news-story/a9e14c45847657214fbb6b436db716f8

    Return to headline | Return to top

Add recipients

Suggested