ethicon 5/20

Client Attorney Privileged/Attorney Work Product/At Request of Counsel

Online Sources

1. Advantage Transvaginal Mesh Case Settles Mid-Trial in California Federal Court

   May 19, 2015 | HarrisMartin Publishing

   A lawsuit accusing Boston Scientific Corp. of negligently designing its Advantage Fit transvaginal mesh device and failing to adequately warn of its risks has settled mid-trial in a California federal court.
2. *New* Upcoming Transvaginal Mesh Trials

   May 19, 2015 | Mesh Medical Device News Desk

   By Jane Akre
   
   
   For all who might be interested in attending one of the upcoming mesh trials – here is a calendar of the latest cases ahead.

Client Attorney Privileged/Attorney Work Product/At Request of Counsel

Online Sources

1. Advantage Transvaginal Mesh Case Settles Mid-Trial in California Federal Court

   May 19, 2015 | HarrisMartin Publishing

    A lawsuit accusing Boston Scientific Corp. of negligently designing its Advantage Fit transvaginal mesh device and failing to adequately warn of its risks has settled mid-trial in a California federal court.

   Trial began on May 5 in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California before Judge John F. Walter. Right before closing arguments, the parties announced that they had reached a confidential settlement. They entered into a joint stipulation for voluntary dismissal on May 12.

   California resident Roseanne Sanchez was surgically implanted with the Pinnacle Pelvic Floor Repair Kit to treat pelvic organ prolapse ...

   Subscription required. For full article please see: http://harrismartin.com/article/19503/advantage-transvaginal-mesh-case-settles-mid-trial-in-california-federal-court/

   Return to headline | Return to top

2. *New* Upcoming Transvaginal Mesh Trials

   May 19, 2015 | Mesh Medical Device News Desk

   By Jane Akre

   For all who might be interested in attending one of the upcoming mesh trials – here is a calendar of the latest cases ahead.

   Visiting for one day- perhaps opening arguments – is a real eye opener and gives a real appreciation on what must happen procedurally.

   Watch for evidence that is allowed in, evidence that is NOT allowed in, the defense argument defending the corporation and its product,  the attack on the credibility of the plaintiff which must occur to lay a seed of doubt about her story.

   Those who have attended trials are never disappointed.

   It gives a real appreciation of how difficult these cases are to bring to court, especially with a limit of two weeks or less!  Please consider attending one.

   
   

   Return to headline | Return to top